SUPPLY CHAIN RESOURCE COOPERATIVE

The value of supply chain intelligence coming from street level knowledge is a recurring theme that people are struggling to understand. The military is a good case study of how one can start to think about this phenomenon. I recently interviewed a former Marine who served in Iraq, who described some of the activities regarding logistics intelligence and demand planning.

“We do a good job of reporting what we have on hand every day. As a company commander we developed a logistics status report This was in a military standardized nine line format where each unit has a logistics report that includes bandages, batteries, and all different classes of material. Your war fighter on the ground at the company level sends up a report with water, chow, ammunition on hand and that goes up to the battalion and up to a depot level. There is also a report that is produced that shows how many bullets during combat operations per marine are required and the standard amount for each piece of equipment, and this is compared against the actual onhand inventory. This goes up to regimental brigade and briefed to the commander at every level. And every commander knows at any point when any company is within 2 days of being out of supplies. In a counter insurgency environment this allows a pipeline to be established in theater when supplies are hitting these units at major points in time and when disruptions occur, the battalion has plans to convoy it at all times.

Although not as dramatic, how can organizations develop the same level of visibility and insight at the supply and customer level? Any responses or ideas from readers would be welcome. I believe this ability to communicate and coordinate using other forms of media besides planning systems, but also exploiting social media and other forums will become more important in the future.

4 Responses

  1. Malcolm

    September 1, 2011 @ 7:10 am

    Trying to wrap my head around this… the company/ industry that I am in… I am not sure how this will work yet. I work for an urban/ hip hop clothing online retailer. We don’t deal with a ton of on-going product. It is all about the new stuff and the speed by which we can get it from vendor to the shelf to the website for it to get picked & out to the customer. Speed & newness of product is key.

    The company that I just left [hard to find computer parts & cables]… now this makes much sense and they do this some. We only deal with 5 or so HUGE distributors and web orders… and so input from them as to what is selling, not selling, what is on hand, what product are they using/ selling all dictates their weekly on-going orders and if there is a need for priority orders or not. The company was dependent upon their respective teams to provide info [intel] as to what is needed. Same thing with their other two warehouses in Canada & UK. Supply chain monitored levels on what was selling the most of and the DC in the US would send what was needed. Many times, if there was a big sell on certain items, then we would send via air a shipment to the UK to respond to that need.

    One way that my current company could watch social media & other forms of Internet traffic is to watch for new & hot selling products being talked about on Twitter, FB, Google+, etc. and have such a relationship with the vendors where we can order more on a priority basis to meet the rising need that is seen on social media.

    Does this make sense? Am I getting what you are talking about?

  2. handfield

    September 1, 2011 @ 9:20 am

    Yes, you’re on the right track here. The trick is to be able to collect social media feedback from a diversity of sources, and be able to code it in such a manner that it can be translated into a forecast for product that is “hot”. I don’t know anything about hip hop styles (that’s for sure!) but here is an example.

    The clothing company Zara had people who were essentially “bar flies” who hung out in the clubs in New York, London, Paris, and watched what people were wearing. They would even draw rough sketches of the style with commentary on colors, etc. and send them in to Zara’s design center. Designers would take the sketches, and essentially draw up “knock offs” that could be quickly produced through their decentralized manufacturing network, consisting of small family run cut and sew operations throughout the country. they would purchase bulk quantities of fabric, have them cut through computerized cutting technologies, and produce them in small batches which were dispatched to sewing operations. These would be then distributed to the same markets where the trends were being observed. Total cycle time for this was aorund 4-6 weeks….incredible!

    Today we have social media – so is there a way to track trends and be able to consolidate these into a set of meaningful observations. I would look at some of the twitter traffic and be able to see what people are wearing, who the hot hip hop artists are, and then move quickly with sources who can provide clothing that is aligned with these trends….

    Make sense?

  3. Malcolm

    September 1, 2011 @ 8:51 pm

    That does make sense. I am going to our home office next week [I am at our 3PL] and will get with our team and see if & how this may be done. With various groups that do social networking it could very well be happening on a buyers level.

    How & where within the supply chain do you see this being done? Buyers? Marketing? Where?

  4. handfield

    September 2, 2011 @ 8:03 am

    I think it would make sense to look at the point closest to the consumer. The buyers level would be the obvious place to look….where do the buyers get their ideas? What are their sources? I would start there perhaps..



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.